CVE-2024-47736

Vulnérabilité non évaluée dans Linux (Linux)

CVSS 0.0 · Non évaluée
EPSS 0.2%
Linux•Linux•Versions : 6.12, <=6.1.*, <=6.11.*, <5.13, 6.10.13, <b9b30af0e86ffb485301ecd83b9129c9dfb7ebf8, 0, <9e2f9d34dd12e6e5b244ec488bcebd0c2d566c50, <9cfa199bcbbbba31cbf97b2786f44f4464f3f29a, <=6.6.*, 6.6.72, 5.13, 8e6c8fa9f2e95c88a642521a5da19a8e31748846, <c1172e65aad4b115392ea4c6e61e56e5b9b69df4, <=*, <1bf7e414cac303c9aec1be67872e19be8b64980c, 6.1.168, 6.11.2, <=6.10.*

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly syzbot reported a task hang issue due to a deadlock case where it is waiting for the folio lock of a cached folio that will be used for cache I/Os. After looking into the crafted fuzzed image, I found it's formed with several overlapped big pclusters as below: Ext: logical offset | length : physical offset | length 0: 0.. 16384 | 16384 : 151552.. 167936 | 16384 1: 16384.. 32768 | 16384 : 155648.. 172032 | 16384 2: 32768.. 49152 | 16384 : 537223168.. 537239552 | 16384 ... Here, extent 0/1 are physically overlapped although it's entirely _impossible_ for normal filesystem images generated by mkfs. First, managed folios containing compressed data will be marked as up-to-date and then unlocked immediately (unlike in-place folios) when compressed I/Os are complete. If physical blocks are not submitted in the incremental order, there should be separate BIOs to avoid dependency issues. However, the current code mis-arranges z_erofs_fill_bio_vec() and BIO submission which causes unexpected BIO waits. Second, managed folios will be connected to their own pclusters for efficient inter-queries. However, this is somewhat hard to implement easily if overlapped big pclusters exist. Again, these only appear in fuzzed images so let's simply fall back to temporary short-lived pages for correctness. Additionally, it justifies that referenced managed folios cannot be truncated for now and reverts part of commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy up `struct z_erofs_bvec`") for simplicity although it shouldn't be any difference.

Gravité et risque d'exploitation

CVE-2024-47736 obtient un score CVSS de 0.0/10, soit une gravité non évaluée. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.18 %, ce qui la place devant 7.3 % des CVE référencées.

Que faire ?

  • Vérifiez si Linux (versions 6.12, <=6.1.*, <=6.11.*, <5.13, 6.10.13, <b9b30af0e86ffb485301ecd83b9129c9dfb7ebf8, 0, <9e2f9d34dd12e6e5b244ec488bcebd0c2d566c50, <9cfa199bcbbbba31cbf97b2786f44f4464f3f29a, <=6.6.*, 6.6.72, 5.13, 8e6c8fa9f2e95c88a642521a5da19a8e31748846, <c1172e65aad4b115392ea4c6e61e56e5b9b69df4, <=*, <1bf7e414cac303c9aec1be67872e19be8b64980c, 6.1.168, 6.11.2, <=6.10.*) est présent sur votre parc.
  • Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
  • À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
  • Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.

Références