CVE-2025-22003

Vulnérabilité moyenne dans Linux (Linux)

CVSS 5.5 · Moyenne
EPSS 0.2%
Linux•Linux•Versions : <=*, <=6.12.*, <cc29775a8a72d7f3b56cc026796ad99bd65804a7, 6.14, 6.13.9, <6.2, 6.6.85, <=6.6.*, <1d22a122ffb116c3cf78053e812b8b21f8852ee9, 7fdaf8966aae476deafe11f9a0067ff588615444, <a4994161a61bc8fd71d105c579d847cefee99262, <8cec9e314d3360fc1d8346297c41a6ee45cb45a9, 0, 6.12.21, <=6.13.*, 6.2

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source is not NUL terminated. Instead of doing a copy in a local buffer, directly NUL terminate it as soon as usb_control_msg() returns. With this, the local firmware_str[] variable can be removed. On top of this do a couple refactors: - ucan_ctl_payload->raw is only used for the firmware string, so rename it to ucan_ctl_payload->fw_str and change its type from u8 to char. - ucan_device_request_in() is only used to retrieve the firmware string, so rename it to ucan_get_fw_str() and refactor it to make it directly handle all the string termination logic.

Gravité et risque d'exploitation

CVE-2025-22003 obtient un score CVSS de 5.5/10, soit une gravité moyenne. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.19 %, ce qui la place devant 8.0 % des CVE référencées.

Que faire ?

  • Vérifiez si Linux (versions <=*, <=6.12.*, <cc29775a8a72d7f3b56cc026796ad99bd65804a7, 6.14, 6.13.9, <6.2, 6.6.85, <=6.6.*, <1d22a122ffb116c3cf78053e812b8b21f8852ee9, 7fdaf8966aae476deafe11f9a0067ff588615444, <a4994161a61bc8fd71d105c579d847cefee99262, <8cec9e314d3360fc1d8346297c41a6ee45cb45a9, 0, 6.12.21, <=6.13.*, 6.2) est présent sur votre parc.
  • Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
  • À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
  • Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.

Références