CVE-2025-68356

Vulnérabilité non évaluée dans Linux (Linux)

CVSS 0.0 · Non évaluée
EPSS 0.2%
Linux•Linux•Versions : 6.6, <=*, <=6.12.*, <49e7347f4644d031306d56cb4d51e467cbdcbc69, 6.17.13, <6.6, <=6.17.*, <2c5f4a53476e3cab70adc77b38942c066bd2c17c, 6.18.2, <=6.18.*, <edb2b255618621dc83d0ec23150e16b2c697077f, 6.12.63, 6.19, 0, dc0b9435238c1a68150c798c9c7a1b5d7414cbb9, <9c0960ed112398bdb6c60ccf6e6b583bc59acede

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Prevent recursive memory reclaim Function new_inode() returns a new inode with inode->i_mapping->gfp_mask set to GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE. This value includes the __GFP_FS flag, so allocations in that address space can recurse into filesystem memory reclaim. We don't want that to happen because it can consume a significant amount of stack memory. Worse than that is that it can also deadlock: for example, in several places, gfs2_unstuff_dinode() is called inside filesystem transactions. This calls filemap_grab_folio(), which can allocate a new folio, which can trigger memory reclaim. If memory reclaim recurses into the filesystem and starts another transaction, a deadlock will ensue. To fix these kinds of problems, prevent memory reclaim from recursing into filesystem code by making sure that the gfp_mask of inode address spaces doesn't include __GFP_FS. The "meta" and resource group address spaces were already using GFP_NOFS as their gfp_mask (which doesn't include __GFP_FS). The default value of GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE is less restrictive than GFP_NOFS, though. To avoid being overly limiting, use the default value and only knock off the __GFP_FS flag. I'm not sure if this will actually make a difference, but it also shouldn't hurt. This patch is loosely based on commit ad22c7a043c2 ("xfs: prevent stack overflows from page cache allocation"). Fixes xfstest generic/273.

Gravité et risque d'exploitation

CVE-2025-68356 obtient un score CVSS de 0.0/10, soit une gravité non évaluée. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.21 %, ce qui la place devant 10.6 % des CVE référencées.

Que faire ?

  • Vérifiez si Linux (versions 6.6, <=*, <=6.12.*, <49e7347f4644d031306d56cb4d51e467cbdcbc69, 6.17.13, <6.6, <=6.17.*, <2c5f4a53476e3cab70adc77b38942c066bd2c17c, 6.18.2, <=6.18.*, <edb2b255618621dc83d0ec23150e16b2c697077f, 6.12.63, 6.19, 0, dc0b9435238c1a68150c798c9c7a1b5d7414cbb9, <9c0960ed112398bdb6c60ccf6e6b583bc59acede) est présent sur votre parc.
  • Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
  • À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
  • Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.

Références