CVE-2026-23161

Vulnérabilité élevée dans Linux (Linux)

CVSS 7.3 · Élevée
EPSS 0.1%
Linux•Linux•Versions : <b23bee8cdb7aabce5701a7f57414db5a354ae8ed, 6.12, <=*, <a99f9a4669a04662c8f9efe0e62cafc598153139, <=6.12.*, 6.12.69, 6.19, <=6.18.*, <8a1968bd997f45a9b11aefeabdd1232e1b6c7184, 0, 809bc86517cc408b5b8cb8e08e69096639432bc8, <6.12, 6.18.9

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/shmem, swap: fix race of truncate and swap entry split The helper for shmem swap freeing is not handling the order of swap entries correctly. It uses xa_cmpxchg_irq to erase the swap entry, but it gets the entry order before that using xa_get_order without lock protection, and it may get an outdated order value if the entry is split or changed in other ways after the xa_get_order and before the xa_cmpxchg_irq. And besides, the order could grow and be larger than expected, and cause truncation to erase data beyond the end border. For example, if the target entry and following entries are swapped in or freed, then a large folio was added in place and swapped out, using the same entry, the xa_cmpxchg_irq will still succeed, it's very unlikely to happen though. To fix that, open code the Xarray cmpxchg and put the order retrieval and value checking in the same critical section. Also, ensure the order won't exceed the end border, skip it if the entry goes across the border. Skipping large swap entries crosses the end border is safe here. Shmem truncate iterates the range twice, in the first iteration, find_lock_entries already filtered such entries, and shmem will swapin the entries that cross the end border and partially truncate the folio (split the folio or at least zero part of it). So in the second loop here, if we see a swap entry that crosses the end order, it must at least have its content erased already. I observed random swapoff hangs and kernel panics when stress testing ZSWAP with shmem. After applying this patch, all problems are gone.

Gravité et risque d'exploitation

CVE-2026-23161 obtient un score CVSS de 7.3/10, soit une gravité élevée. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.10 %, ce qui la place devant 0.9 % des CVE référencées.

Que faire ?

  • Vérifiez si Linux (versions <b23bee8cdb7aabce5701a7f57414db5a354ae8ed, 6.12, <=*, <a99f9a4669a04662c8f9efe0e62cafc598153139, <=6.12.*, 6.12.69, 6.19, <=6.18.*, <8a1968bd997f45a9b11aefeabdd1232e1b6c7184, 0, 809bc86517cc408b5b8cb8e08e69096639432bc8, <6.12, 6.18.9) est présent sur votre parc.
  • Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
  • À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
  • Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.

Références