CVE-2026-23267

Vulnérabilité non évaluée dans Linux (Linux)

CVSS 0.0 · Non évaluée
EPSS 0.1%
Linux•Linux•Versions : 6.19.3, <=6.1.*, <=6.12.*, 608514deba38c8611ad330d6a3c8e2b9a1f68e4b, 6.12.74, <962c167b0f262b9962207fbeaa531721d55ea00e, 6.1.164, 6.18.13, 0, <75e19da068adf0dc5dd269dd157392434b9117d4, 7.0, <=6.6.*, <=6.19.*, <7633a7387eb4d0259d6bea945e1d3469cd135bbc, 4.7, <=6.18.*, <32bc3c9fe18881d50dd51fd5f26d19fe1190dc0d, <bd66b4c487d5091d2a65d6089e0de36f0c26a4c7, <=*, <4.7, 6.6.127, <ed81bc5885460905f9160e7b463e5708fd056324

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix IS_CHECKPOINTED flag inconsistency issue caused by concurrent atomic commit and checkpoint writes During SPO tests, when mounting F2FS, an -EINVAL error was returned from f2fs_recover_inode_page. The issue occurred under the following scenario Thread A Thread B f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write - f2fs_do_sync_file // atomic = true - f2fs_fsync_node_pages : last_folio = inode folio : schedule before folio_lock(last_folio) f2fs_write_checkpoint - block_operations// writeback last_folio - schedule before f2fs_flush_nat_entries : set_fsync_mark(last_folio, 1) : set_dentry_mark(last_folio, 1) : folio_mark_dirty(last_folio) - __write_node_folio(last_folio) : f2fs_down_read(&sbi->node_write)//block - f2fs_flush_nat_entries : {struct nat_entry}->flag |= BIT(IS_CHECKPOINTED) - unblock_operations : f2fs_up_write(&sbi->node_write) f2fs_write_checkpoint//return : f2fs_do_write_node_page() f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write//return SPO Thread A calls f2fs_need_dentry_mark(sbi, ino), and the last_folio has already been written once. However, the {struct nat_entry}->flag did not have the IS_CHECKPOINTED set, causing set_dentry_mark(last_folio, 1) and write last_folio again after Thread B finishes f2fs_write_checkpoint. After SPO and reboot, it was detected that {struct node_info}->blk_addr was not NULL_ADDR because Thread B successfully write the checkpoint. This issue only occurs in atomic write scenarios. For regular file fsync operations, the folio must be dirty. If block_operations->f2fs_sync_node_pages successfully submit the folio write, this path will not be executed. Otherwise, the f2fs_write_checkpoint will need to wait for the folio write submission to complete, as sbi->nr_pages[F2FS_DIRTY_NODES] > 0. Therefore, the situation where f2fs_need_dentry_mark checks that the {struct nat_entry}->flag /wo the IS_CHECKPOINTED flag, but the folio write has already been submitted, will not occur. Therefore, for atomic file fsync, sbi->node_write should be acquired through __write_node_folio to ensure that the IS_CHECKPOINTED flag correctly indicates that the checkpoint write has been completed.

Gravité et risque d'exploitation

CVE-2026-23267 obtient un score CVSS de 0.0/10, soit une gravité non évaluée. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.12 %, ce qui la place devant 1.6 % des CVE référencées.

Que faire ?

  • Vérifiez si Linux (versions 6.19.3, <=6.1.*, <=6.12.*, 608514deba38c8611ad330d6a3c8e2b9a1f68e4b, 6.12.74, <962c167b0f262b9962207fbeaa531721d55ea00e, 6.1.164, 6.18.13, 0, <75e19da068adf0dc5dd269dd157392434b9117d4, 7.0, <=6.6.*, <=6.19.*, <7633a7387eb4d0259d6bea945e1d3469cd135bbc, 4.7, <=6.18.*, <32bc3c9fe18881d50dd51fd5f26d19fe1190dc0d, <bd66b4c487d5091d2a65d6089e0de36f0c26a4c7, <=*, <4.7, 6.6.127, <ed81bc5885460905f9160e7b463e5708fd056324) est présent sur votre parc.
  • Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
  • À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
  • Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.

Références