CVE-2026-46319
Vulnérabilité élevée dans Linux (Linux)
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_ct: Only release RCU read lock after ct_ft When looking up a flow table in act_ct in tcf_ct_flow_table_get(), rhashtable_lookup_fast() internally opens and closes an RCU read critical section before returning ct_ft. The tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() can complete before refcount_inc_not_zero() is invoked on the returned ct_ft resulting in a UAF on the already freed ct_ft object. This vulnerability can lead to privilege escalation. Analysis from zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com: When initializing act_ct, tcf_ct_init() is called, which internally triggers tcf_ct_flow_table_get(). static int tcf_ct_flow_table_get(struct net *net, struct tcf_ct_params *params) { struct zones_ht_key key = { .net = net, .zone = params->zone }; struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft; int err = -ENOMEM; mutex_lock(&zones_mutex); ct_ft = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&zones_ht, &key, zones_params); // [1] if (ct_ft && refcount_inc_not_zero(&ct_ft->ref)) // [2] goto out_unlock; ... } static __always_inline void *rhashtable_lookup_fast( struct rhashtable *ht, const void *key, const struct rhashtable_params params) { void *obj; rcu_read_lock(); obj = rhashtable_lookup(ht, key, params); rcu_read_unlock(); return obj; } At [1], rhashtable_lookup_fast() looks up and returns the corresponding ct_ft from zones_ht . The lookup is performed within an RCU read critical section through rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock(), which prevents the object from being freed. However, at the point of function return, rcu_read_unlock() has already been called, and there is nothing preventing ct_ft from being freed before reaching refcount_inc_not_zero(&ct_ft->ref) at [2]. This interval becomes the race window, during which ct_ft can be freed. Free Process: tcf_ct_flow_table_put() is executed through the path tcf_ct_cleanup() call_rcu() tcf_ct_params_free_rcu() tcf_ct_params_free() tcf_ct_flow_table_put(). static void tcf_ct_flow_table_put(struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft) { if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ct_ft->ref)) { rhashtable_remove_fast(&zones_ht, &ct_ft->node, zones_params); INIT_RCU_WORK(&ct_ft->rwork, tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work); // [3] queue_rcu_work(act_ct_wq, &ct_ft->rwork); } } At [3], tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() is scheduled as RCU work static void tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft; struct flow_block *block; ct_ft = container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct tcf_ct_flow_table, rwork); nf_flow_table_free(&ct_ft->nf_ft); block = &ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block; down_write(&ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block_lock); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block->cb_list)); up_write(&ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block_lock); kfree(ct_ft); // [4] module_put(THIS_MODULE); } tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() frees ct_ft at [4]. When this function executes between [1] and [2], UAF occurs. This race condition has a very short race window, making it generally difficult to trigger. Therefore, to trigger the vulnerability an msleep(100) was inserted after[1]
Gravité et risque d'exploitation
CVE-2026-46319 obtient un score CVSS de 7.8/10, soit une gravité élevée. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.13 %, ce qui la place devant 2.4 % des CVE référencées.
Que faire ?
- Vérifiez si Linux (versions <=6.1.*, <=7.0.*, <=6.12.*, 0, <17dfb67cb399b660105d9a8c6100851c0d0cdc70, <67c9ecc9f2575273ed1323e312881fc98ac83d6d, 6.18.33, <4c727c6967a41b37efe0f26332ca9ec5b74785a3, <3e20e1b3058e0b94638e7b931c138e840e266724, 5.15.209, <5.7, 6.12.91, <=5.10.*, <=6.6.*, 6.1.175, 138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a, 6.6.141, <f462dca0c8415bf0058d0ffa476354c4476d0f09, 7.1, <f23424a0ddadb494d4bd57056a7ca703312d3a7b, <=6.18.*, 7.0.10, 5.10.258, <ece578ca61e572df96cfc80456357ebfae0b4b9e, 5.7, <=*, <=5.15.*, <a2e0c045c87aa252eb61412e67dd91f2c2b19f81) est présent sur votre parc.
- Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
- À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
- Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.
Références
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ece578ca61e572df96cfc80456357ebfae0b4b9e
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2e0c045c87aa252eb61412e67dd91f2c2b19f81
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/67c9ecc9f2575273ed1323e312881fc98ac83d6d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f23424a0ddadb494d4bd57056a7ca703312d3a7b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/17dfb67cb399b660105d9a8c6100851c0d0cdc70
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c727c6967a41b37efe0f26332ca9ec5b74785a3
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e20e1b3058e0b94638e7b931c138e840e266724
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f462dca0c8415bf0058d0ffa476354c4476d0f09
