CVE-2026-63950

Vulnérabilité élevée dans Linux (Linux)

CVSS 7.8 · Élevée
EPSS 0.2%
Linux•Linux•Versions : <=7.0.*, <0fcc34d0d8fefca4fea349e45c10e3a3d90350eb, 6.18.35, 7.0.12, <=*, 7.1, <6.15, <=6.18.*, 0, <f611db9b771b2b6775357555d2517af044fca4f0, 354dffd29575cdf13154e8fb787322354aa9efc4, 6.15, <3f8968e9cbf95d5d87d32218906cab0b9b9eddbe

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/rmap: initialize nr_pages to 1 at loop start in try_to_unmap_one Initialize nr_pages to 1 at the start of each loop iteration, like folio_referenced_one() does. Without this, nr_pages computed by a previous folio_unmap_pte_batch() call can be reused on a later iteration that does not run folio_unmap_pte_batch() again. mmap a 64K large folio with MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_DROPPABLE, then call madvise(MADV_FREE), then make the last page device-exclusive via HMM_DMIRROR_EXCLUSIVE. Trigger node reclaim through sysfs. Now, in try_to_unmap_one(), we will first clear the first 15 out of 16 entries mapping the lazyfree folio. This will set nr_pages to 15. In the next pvmw walk, this nr_pages gets reused on a device-exclusive pte, thus potentially corrupting folio refcount/mapcount. At the moment, I have a userspace program which can make the kernel spit out a trace, but the blow up is in folio_referenced_one(), because there are existing bugs in the interaction between device-private and rmap (which too I am investigating). I did a one liner kernel change to avoid going into folio_referenced_one(), and the kernel blows up at folio_remove_rmap_ptes in try_to_unmap_one which is what I wanted. Note that the bug is there not since file folio batching but lazyfree folio batching, since device-exclusive only works for anonymous folios. Userspace visible effect is simply kernel crashing somewhere due to refcount/mapcount corruption.

Gravité et risque d'exploitation

CVE-2026-63950 obtient un score CVSS de 7.8/10, soit une gravité élevée. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.17 %, ce qui la place devant 6.4 % des CVE référencées.

Que faire ?

  • Vérifiez si Linux (versions <=7.0.*, <0fcc34d0d8fefca4fea349e45c10e3a3d90350eb, 6.18.35, 7.0.12, <=*, 7.1, <6.15, <=6.18.*, 0, <f611db9b771b2b6775357555d2517af044fca4f0, 354dffd29575cdf13154e8fb787322354aa9efc4, 6.15, <3f8968e9cbf95d5d87d32218906cab0b9b9eddbe) est présent sur votre parc.
  • Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
  • À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
  • Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.

Références