CVE-2026-89759

Vulnérabilité non évaluée dans Linux (Linux)

CVSS 0.0 · Non évaluée
EPSS 0.2%
Linux•Linux•Versions : <3fc8044251de21555fb02c365fa681bab8b0db55, <=*, <=6.12.*, <1838c704bcb4fd3556cf67513c6f97a39099e35c, <5.10, <=6.18.*, 7.2.4, c4b28963fd79457315783b3b0f21c01eb88cfdc1, 6.18.50, 7.3, 0, <5d10d4e19e6daa487f0cd0ea6cba472325de92f9, <=7.2.*, 6.12.109, 5.10, <9a1b12c06c192290b8479de48f66f1e75d89c4b7

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks Patch series "mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task", v3. kmemleak_scan() scans every task stack under one rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point, which can trip the soft lockup watchdog on hosts with very many threads. That prints the following message, depending on the workload+host configuration: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537] scan_block kmemleak_scan kmemleak_scan_thread kthread Patch 1 walks the tasks with find_ge_pid() so the scan reschedules between tasks Patches 2-3 let the scan loops stop early once a scan is interrupted. This patch (of 3): kmemleak_scan() walks every thread and scans its kernel stack under a single rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point. On a host with very many threads -- amplified by KASAN/lockdep in debug builds -- this loop can hog a CPU long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537] scan_block kmemleak_scan kmemleak_scan_thread kthread A cond_resched() cannot be added directly: the loop runs inside an RCU read-side critical section. Walk the tasks one PID at a time with find_ge_pid(), taking the RCU read lock only to look up and pin each task. The stack is then scanned with no lock held, so cond_resched() runs between tasks and the scan stops early on scan_should_stop(). This follows the next_tgid()/task_seq_get_next() iteration pattern and keeps each RCU critical section short.

Gravité et risque d'exploitation

CVE-2026-89759 obtient un score CVSS de 0.0/10, soit une gravité non évaluée. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.19 %, ce qui la place devant 8.3 % des CVE référencées.

Que faire ?

  • Vérifiez si Linux (versions <3fc8044251de21555fb02c365fa681bab8b0db55, <=*, <=6.12.*, <1838c704bcb4fd3556cf67513c6f97a39099e35c, <5.10, <=6.18.*, 7.2.4, c4b28963fd79457315783b3b0f21c01eb88cfdc1, 6.18.50, 7.3, 0, <5d10d4e19e6daa487f0cd0ea6cba472325de92f9, <=7.2.*, 6.12.109, 5.10, <9a1b12c06c192290b8479de48f66f1e75d89c4b7) est présent sur votre parc.
  • Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
  • À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
  • Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.

Références