CVE-2026-96618
Vulnérabilité faible dans hex (hexpm)
Description
Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in hexpm hex allows an untrusted package mirror to exhaust the memory or disk space of the machine running mix deps.get, mix deps.update, mix hex.package fetch or mix hex.docs fetch. Hex treats a mirror configured with HEX_MIRROR_URL, HEX_MIRROR or mirror_url as untrusted: it doesn't send credentials to it, and it checks registry signatures and package checksums that the mirror can't forge. Several response paths consume memory or disk in proportion to what the mirror sends before any of those checks run. Hex.HTTP.request/5 reads the whole response body into memory and decompresses it with :zlib.gunzip/1 whenever the response's Content-Encoding contains gzip, with no limit on the compressed or decompressed size. Hex doesn't ask for compressed responses, so the server decides whether this step runs. It applies to registry, package, docs and API responses. Package tarballs have no download size limit. Hex 2.5.1 holds the whole tarball in memory and writes it to the cache, and the development branch streams it to a temporary file; the 16 MiB tarball limit is checked only when the file is unpacked. The tarball is then unpacked, into deps/<app> in 2.5.1 and into a staging directory on the development branch, before its checksums are compared with the registry. mix hex.docs fetch, and mix hex.docs offline when docs are missing, write the docs tarball to disk and extract it with :mix_hex_erl_tar.extract/2 without the 16 MiB compressed and 128 MiB decompressed limits that mix_hex_tarball:unpack_docs/3 applies. The signed registry doesn't cover docs tarballs, so nothing checks them. Registry responses are also decompressed before their signature is checked, in hex_core code that Hex vendors; that part is tracked in https://github.com/hexpm/hex_core/security/advisories/GHSA-7c4r-cgf9-9jmq. This issue affects hex: from 0.11.2 before 2.5.2.
Gravité et risque d'exploitation
CVE-2026-96618 obtient un score CVSS de 2.1/10, soit une gravité faible. Selon le modèle EPSS, la probabilité qu'elle soit exploitée dans les 30 prochains jours est de 0.33 %, ce qui la place devant 24.7 % des CVE référencées.
Que faire ?
- Vérifiez si hex (versions <*, 0.11.2, 51ea632424fb6ea8765148f96dc25dfeb526b1f8, <2.5.2) est présent sur votre parc.
- Appliquez le correctif ou la version corrigée indiqués dans les références de l'éditeur.
- À défaut de correctif, limitez l'exposition (filtrage réseau, désactivation du composant).
- Automatisez la détection : les agents CVE Heimdall (gratuits, open source) corrèlent l'inventaire de vos serveurs avec la base CVE.
Références
- https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-gf42-pg2f-63jp
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-96618.html
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-96618
- https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/51ea632424fb6ea8765148f96dc25dfeb526b1f8
- https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/bb5189eade682c5fc3f98d9725973a7beb4e1deb
- https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/08956100a8283ba500a123e5539ac64d5d7e91d8
